Return to the home page. top banner right
top banner bottom
Click to search.
members
Login:
Password:
Click to login
Click for Log In Help
Click to Join the Society
 
 
 
 
Click for the Heart Rhythm Foundation
Click for the IBHRE (formerly NASPExAM)
Click for Professional Education
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Click for Health Policy
Click for News & Information
Click for Scientific Sessions
Click for the HRS Calendar
Click for the HeartRhythm Journal
Click for the HRS Store
Click to Find a Specialist
Click for Patient Information
Click for About HRS
Click for Membership
titlelines DEFINITE Clinical Trial

Title of Trial
The Defibrillators in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Treatment Evaluation (DEFINITE)

Date and location of presentation:
November, 2003 AHA

Purpose of the Trial
Up to 1/3 of heart failure patients have non-ischemic cardiomyopathy as their etiology, yet there has not been a large-scale clinical trial to evaluate the role of ICD therapy in this patient population. DEFINITE is the first large-scale trial to present data concerning the potential benefit of ICD therapy in this patient population.

Study Category
ICD

Patient Population
Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy

Inclusion Criteria
Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy; spontaneous PVCs (> 10/hour or NSVT; LVEF <35%;

Exclusion Criteria
Symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia or history of sudden cardiac death; NYHA class IV heart failure

Study Design
Prospective, randomized trial to compare a "standard medical therapy" group (ACEI and Beta-blockers) with an "ICD" group (ACEI, Beta-blockers, and single-chamber ICD).

Primary Endpoints
All cause mortality

Secondary Endpoints
Sudden cardiac death rate

Baseline Characteristics

Number of patients: 458 patients from 45 centers in the US and Israel

Time to Follow-up
The average follow-up time was 82 days in the ON group, and 85 days in the OFF group (p=0.96).

Mean age:
58 years

Gender: % female; Unknown

Other characteristics: Mean EF of 21%

Years Follow-up: Mean of 26 + 4 months

Results:

Primary end-point
Overall 33 deaths were noted in the "standard medical therapy" group vs. 23 in "ICD" group (p=0.06). After 2 years, 13.8% mortality rate was seen in the "standard medical therapy" group vs. a 8.1% rate in the "ICD" group, representing respectively a 5.7% absolute reduction and a 34% relative risk reduction with ICD implantation. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients with NYHA Class III CHF had a highly significant decrease in all-cause mortality with ICD implantation (relative risk 0.34).

Secondary end-point
11 "arrhythmic deaths" were observed in the "Standard therapy" group vs. 3 in "ICD" group providing a hazard ratio of 0.26.

Conclusion
ICD therapy reduces the incidence of "arrhythmic death" in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathic patients with severe LV dysfunction and PVCs or NSVT concomitantly treated with ACEI and Beta-blockers. There was no statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality noted between "standard therapy" group and "ICD" group.

Sponsor
St. Jude Medical

Trial Status: Completed

Review written by Sung Chun, M.D.

Click to Print Page.Click to Email Page. Click to Contact Us.Click for the Site Map.
© Heart Rhythm Society      1400 K St NW ste 500      Washington DC 20005      tel 202.464.3400      fax 202.464.3401