Return to the home page. top banner right
top banner bottom
Click to search.
members
Login:
Password:
Click to login
Click for Log In Help
Click to Join the Society
 
 
 
 
Click for the Heart Rhythm Foundation
Click for the IBHRE (formerly NASPExAM)
Click for Professional Education
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Click for Health Policy
Click for News & Information
Click for Scientific Sessions
Click for the HRS Calendar
Click for the HeartRhythm Journal
Click for the HRS Store
Click to Find a Specialist
Click for Patient Information
Click for About HRS
Click for Membership
titlelines PIC Clinical Trial
Pacing for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Title of Trial
Pacing in Cardiomyopathy (PIC) Study

Date and Citation of Primary Publication(s) or References
Kappenberger L, Linde C, Daubert C, et al for the PIC study group. Pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J 1997; 18: 1249-56.

Purpose of the Trial
Evaluate the effects of pacing therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Study Category
Pacing

Patient Population
Inclusion Criteria
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with a resting or provocable gradient > 30 mm Hg and NYHA Class II or III functional limitation despite maximal drug therapy. Acute pacing trial to evaluate effects of pacing.

Exclusion Criteria
NYHA class IV, drug refractory systemic hypertension, documented coronary artery disease, ejection fraction < 0.50, chronic atrial fibrillation, age < 18 years old, or pacing required for a standard bradycardia indication (except drug induced bradycardia)

Study Design
Randomized double blind crossover trial. Pacemakers were programmed to either active DDD pacing mode with a short AV delay (30 ms) or to the AAI pacing mode at a rate of 30 bpm. Patients were in each pacing mode for 12 weeks.

Primary Endpoints
NYHA class, quality of life

Secondary Endpoints
Exercise tolerance

Baseline Characteristics
Patient number: 83 patients
Mean Age: 53 years
Gender: 40% female
Other characteristics:
In 77% of patients pacing was associated with a > 30% reduction in peak gradient.

Time to Follow-up
Two 12-week periods

Results
The DDD pacing mode with a short AV delay was associated with a reduction in left ventricular outflow tract gradient (59 ± 36 mm Hg to 30 ± 25 mmHg; p < 0.001). As shown in Table 1, NYHA class improved from baseline regardless of whether the patient was programmed to the AAI or DDD with short AV delay pacing modes. A significant placebo effect was noted with 29% of patients improving with the pacemaker in the AAI pacing mode. As shown in Table 2, the DDD with short AV delay pacing mode was associated with significant improvement in symptoms compared to the AAI pacing mode. However, no difference in exercise duration was noted between the two pacing modes. In a post-hoc analysis, DDD pacing with a short AV delay increased exercise tolerance by 21% in patients with reduced exercise tolerance at baseline (< 10 minutes on a standard Bruce protocol)


Table 1: Effects of pacing mode on NYHA class

NYHA class Baseline AAI DDD with short AV delay
I 0 4 29
II 28 37 36
III 42 28 5
IV 0 1 0


Table 2: Symptoms and Exercise duration

  AAI DDD with short AV delay P
NYHA functional class 2.4 1.7 0.0001
Dyspnea grade
(0 to 4)
2.4 1.4 0.0001
Angina grade
(0 to 4)
1 0.4 0.005
Exercise duration for all patients (min) 12.2 12.4 NS
Exercise duration for patients with duration > 10 minutes at baseline (min) 14.2 14.2 NS
Exercise duration for patients with duration < 10 minutes at baseline (min) 8.1 9.8 0.008


Sponsor
Medtronic, Swiss National Foundation for Scientific Research, and the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation

Trial Status:  Completed

Click to Print Page.Click to Email Page. Click to Contact Us.Click for the Site Map.
© Heart Rhythm Society      1400 K St NW ste 500      Washington DC 20005      tel 202.464.3400      fax 202.464.3401