The Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) supports the development of scientific documents to advance foundational knowledge, clarify emerging scientific trends, and guide future directions in cardiac electrophysiology. These documents provide timely, evidence-informed insights on key topics that are critical to the arrhythmia care community but are not addressed through traditional clinical practice guidelines.

To manage this important work, the HRS established the Scientific Documents Committee (SDC), which oversees the entire development process—from proposal review to endorsement and publication. The SDC works closely with other HRS committees, including the Clinical Guidelines Committee, to ensure a cohesive publication strategy that avoids duplication and reflects the Society’s mission and strategic priorities.

The HRS Scientific Documents Methodology Manual outlines the standards and processes by which HRS develops a wide range of scientific documents, including scientific statements, rapid science updates, clinical decision pathways, appropriate use criteria, competency and training statements, operator and institutional requirements, data standards, and health policy statements. These documents are developed in collaboration with diverse stakeholders and are grounded in transparency, methodological rigor, and responsiveness to emerging needs in the field.

The methodology described in the manual reflects best practices in evidence synthesis and document development, and is informed by HRS’s experience with collaborative, multidisciplinary authorship and peer review.

The following stages make up the HRS scientific document development process:

  • Topic identification and prioritization
  • Writing committee formation and authorship
  • Disclosure and management of relationships with industry (RWI)
  • Refinement of scope and evidence review
  • Development of recommendations (when applicable)
  • Drafting and review of the manuscript
  • Peer review and optional public comment
  • Endorsement by HRS and external societies
  • Publication and dissemination
  • Ongoing review for currency and updates

HRS scientific documents are developed independently of industry funding. All disclosures and funding sources are transparently reported in the published documents.

If you have questions or would like more information, please email [email protected].

Available Resources
Latest Clinical Documents

Considerations for Drug Interactions on QTc Interval in Exploratory COVID-19 Treatment

April 14, 2020

Guidance for Cardiac Electrophysiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic from the HRS COVID-19 Task Force, ACC Electrophysiology Section, and the AHA Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology

April 1, 2020

2020 ACC Clinical Competencies for Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants in Adult Cardiovascular Medicine

March 20, 2020

2019 APHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Three-Dimensional Mapping Systems for Tachycardia, Developed in Collaboration with HRS, EHRA, and LAHRS

March 9, 2020

SCAI Multi-Society Position Statement on Occupational Health Hazards of the Catheterization Laboratory: Shifting the Paradigm for Healthcare Workers’ Protection

February 11, 2020

Volunteer for HRS Documents

The Heart Rhythm Society regularly issues calls for writing committee nominees to its membership when new clinical documents are being developed. These calls outline the document scope and the specific expertise needed for each writing group.

If you have a general interest in contributing to HRS clinical documents—either as a peer reviewer or writing committee member—you are welcome to reach out. Please email [email protected] with your CV and areas of expertise, and we will keep your information on file for consideration during future projects